Of Mice and Men Book †Movie Review Essay Sample free essay sample

Of Mice and Men. a dramatic narrative of friendly relationship. dreams that are neer to come true and tough work forces. who seek love and attending in their suffering lives. In his novel. John Steinback throws the ugly truth heterosexual at us. Life wasn’t easy in the 1930. there is no manner to force this out of the manner. It wasn’t easy for the rich. wasn’t easy for the hapless. But hope dies last. and George Milton. together with Lennie Small are a great illustration of this. The narrative takes topographic point during the great depression. a clip when everyone wanted to populate the American Dream. but cipher got to. There are many of import subjects and thoughts portrayed in the book. and by and large. both the film and the book follow the same plotline. However there are some noteworthy differences in the dramatic scenes. characters and even subjects. We will write a custom essay sample on Of Mice and Men Book – Movie Review Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The secret plan of the film and the book is by and large the same. nevertheless some important scenes from the book are losing from the film. An illustration of this could be the scene of Lennie and Candy acquiring to run into Crooks. He opens up in forepart of so. he tells so how abused and hurt he was all his life. and as he says that Curleys married woman comes in. The work forces make it clear that she isn’t wanted at that place. and in response she reminds Criminals that worthless and stupe is how people see him in this state. She tells him how easy she could acquire him hung with merely a twosome of prevarications. This scene supports one of the chief subjects of the narrative. which is racism and the American Dream. that could neer be reached in such a society. The whole event helps us portray Curley’s married woman better every bit good. because since the beginning of the book she seems so sweet. and here we get to see what’s concealed deep underneath her ‘poor small me’ mask. The beginning of the film has a twosome minor errors. but overall it’s alright. It is different in the book. but it is really affectional and lets us cognize what the film is approximately. The biggest defect of the film was likely the stoping. which was far excessively sudden and barbarous. In the novel the reader could truly see George’s tactic is to do Lennie conceive of their hereafter on the spread. and so kill him really all of a sudden so that he takes that one last vision with him. He wants Lennie to decease merrily. in a manner. It the film he looks as if he can’t delay to kill him. he seems fed up and without vacillation he decides to kill Lennie before he even gets the full image of the spread into his head. Overall after the film the spectator is left inquiring what merely happened. In the novel the narrative takes topographic point in California. and the film has a great advantage of being able to movie at that place. Overall the scenes aren’t really of import to the general secret plan therefore the minor differences and errors found in the film aren’t really important. One of these differences is the bunkhouse. which in the novel is portrayed as a much more crowded and damaged by all the old dwellers. country. In the film it looked to broad and glorious. and as a consequence the spectator didn’t realize that these aliens. who had no thought what friendly relationship and intimacy are. were pushed together so much and forced to be with each other without really acquiring any feelings involved. Besides at the really get downing the boss’s office seems to be a small off. and excessively old fashioned and neat for the proprietor of a spread. The film does a really good occupation of demoing the milieus of the farm. though. largely beca use it is filmed in the perfect topographic point at the perfect clip. George Milton and Lennie Small are the most circular and developed characters of the narrative. While reading the book the reader gets a really good thought of who these two characters are and what their relationship with each other is like. They are the chief characters of the book. and they are decidedly the most talked about. Furthermore. they are the topic of the whole narrative. In the novel Lennie has some mental issues that make him look like a kid trapped in an adults organic structure. However. in the film this is excessively overdone and in a twosome parts Lennie seems excessively babyish. One of the scenes where this is an issue is the spot where the coach driver drops the two work forces off. and they walk to the spread. This is the portion where in the fresh George throws Lennie’s dead mouse off. which is a bird in the film. Lennie begins to shout. and runs off. which unluckily isn’t really realistic. In add-on. throughout the film Lennie negotiations in a manner which is really difficult to understand and sounds merely like a babe which isn’t able to talk decently. This makes his sickness even more unrealistic. On the other manus George Milton is slightly excessively rough and unsmooth towards Lennie. instead than being caring and responsible the manner he was in the book. The most dramatic and exciting scenes of both the film and the book are decidedly the fight scene between Lennie and Curley. and the scene of Curley’s wife’s decease. The fight scene is really good done in the film. it is about precisely the manner John Steinbeck wants us to see it in his novel. It seems really realistic and seeing Curley’s massacred manus surely gives you goose bumps. Even though overall it was really affectional. possibly it could be better if Lennie didn’t have such a ruthless and ferocious look on his face while he was nailing Curley’s manus. In comparing. the other dramatic scene. was a small unrealistic. It took topographic point in the barn. and you could really clearly hear the men’s voices. nevertheless they didn’t seem to hear the woman’s terrorizing cries. Here Lennie seems to be excessively barbarous as good. but non every bit much as earlier. Steinbeck’s novel has a really clear message. He puts a batch of weight to the thoughts of friendly relationship. solitariness and the American Dream. He is seeking to demo us how misfortunate the lives of work forces like George or Lennie were during the Great Depression. It is a clip where everyone is unhappy. and everyone believes that they deserve better. but about no 1 gets the opportunity to turn their life about. At the very terminal of the film the spot of duologue about the other work forces non understanding Slim and George’s sorrow after Lennie’s decease is skipped. This is a great loss for the film. because this concluding duologue is what truly made the subject of loneliness base out. The other work forces didn’t understand why George was regretful about killing Lennie. because they didn’t understand their bond the manner Slim did. However. the film does do up for this with the fabulous scene of Candy’s old Canis familiaris being killed. It is really deep. and leaves the spectator truly feeling sorry for Candy and the Canis familiaris. It shows loneliness through the silence that takes over the bunkhouse when Carlson takes Candy’s Canis familiaris off. Everyone feels sorry for him. but no 1 says anything. This shows how closed up in their small worlds the work forces are. how afraid they are to state anything to soothe a individual in demand. They don’t say anything. and they can’t. After so many old ages of maintaining everything to yourself it is really difficult to open up your bosom to others.